Resources/Comparison/EasyGen

Kast vs EasyGen: copy creators or keep your own voice

Prices checked on September 23, 2026 at easygen.io.

EasyGen is upfront about how it works, right on its homepage: writing posts "like the creators with 100 million views", using data from the top accounts and trending topics. The trial lasts seven days.

It works well to get started. The cost shows up in month two.

How it works, and where it falls short

A model trained on the best-performing posts produces posts that look like the best-performing posts. The same three-word hooks, the same standalone line to let the text breathe, the same rhetorical question before the CTA.

That works as long as few people use it. In 2026, thousands of accounts post with this kind of tool, and LinkedIn readers recognize the pattern.

When your name is the selling point, sounding like everyone else costs you more than a post that's mediocre but personal.

What Kast does instead

Plume starts from your projects, the work you've delivered and your past posts that worked. It suggests a first draft in the way you write, then you reread and decide. It doesn't write for you and never publishes on its own.

The generic content detector, free and with no account needed, spots seventeen phrasings that give away machine-written text. Paste in a post generated by any tool trained on creators and see which ones show up.

The table, point by point

EasyGenKast
Trial7 days7 days, card required
Writing sourcePosts from the most-viewed creatorsYour projects and your past posts
Trending topicsYesNo
Score before publishingNoFour criteria, targeted rewrite
SchedulingYesLinkedIn and X calendar
Engagement captureNoYes, job title and company
Export for prospectingNoLemlist, Instantly, CSV
Free tools, no account neededNoSix

What EasyGen does better

The cold start. If you've never posted and don't know what to talk about, a library of trending topics gets you through the first week.

Raw production speed, too.

Three real-world situations

Someone who has never posted and wants to start.

EasyGen does the job for the first few weeks. Plan for what comes next.

A consultant whose clients read their posts.

The risk of blending in is immediate, because their peers use the same tools.

A founder who has been posting for six months.

Their material already exists: their client work, the objections they hear in sales, their decisions. That's exactly what Plume feeds on.

Frequently asked questions

Yes, the best available for each step. The difference is in the input, which comes from you, and in the scoring grid, which doesn't change.
Just paste them into the editor. Your published posts are used for voice calibration.
No. We start from your material rather than what's trending on the network.

Making the call

Choose EasyGen if your problem is the blank page.

Choose Kast if your problem is sounding like everyone else, and not knowing who reads you.

The simplest way is still to compare for yourself.

Seven-day free trial, card required, no commitment.

Start for free