Write with AI without your posts sounding like AI

Readers spot generic text in three seconds. The problem isn't the tool, it's asking it to write for you instead of asking it to correct you.

Sound familiar?

Your generated posts all look the same.

The phrasing sounds right but doesn't sound like you.

You spend more time fixing the draft than you would writing it yourself.

Your audience is starting to notice.

What Kast does for you

Kast judges before it writes

Its main job is to score and back it up, not to churn out text.

Rewrites anchored in your own posts

The style reference is your own posts, not a generic platform tone.

Before and after, in plain view

Every edit targets one criterion, and you see exactly what changed.

How to do it, step by step

Write the first draft yourself

Even if it's badly written. That's where your voice is.

Ask for the score, not the text

You get four sub-scores, with evidence for each one.

Fix one dimension at a time

The hook, then the CTA. Never the whole post at once.

Reject anything that doesn't sound like you

That's what the undo button is for, and you should use it often.

Frequently asked questions

Why not just use ChatGPT?

You can, and for a one-off draft that's enough. What's missing is a memory of your voice, a score with reasons, and the link between what you publish and the people who react to it. A general-purpose assistant has none of those three.

How does Kast avoid generic phrasing?

The scoring grid explicitly penalizes stock phrases, and rewrites draw on examples from your own posts rather than an average style.

Articles that go deeper

Stop guessing whether your post is good.

Kast scores it, tells you why, and fixes it with you. 7-day free trial, cancel anytime.

Start for free